Home / MARRIAGE EQUALITY / Seventh Circuit Rules Bans on Marriage Equality Unconstitutional

Seventh Circuit Rules Bans on Marriage Equality Unconstitutional

gay grooms kiss

Third federal appeals court to strike down state marriage ban this year, now two more cases possibly on the way to the Supreme Court of the United States

HRC Press Release– WASHINGTON September 04, 2014? Today the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in cases from two states ? Indiana and Wisconsin ? that state bans on marriage for same-sex couples are unconstitutional.?Baskin v. Bogan?of Indiana ? which was consolidated with?Lee v. Pence?and?Midori Fujii v. State of Indiana?? and Wisconsin’s?Walker v. Wolf?were argued before a three-judge panel of the Seventh Circuit late last month.? In the unanimous ruling today, Judge Richard Posner ? a Ronald Reagan appointee ? wrote, ?The challenged laws discriminate against a minority defined by an immutable characteristic, and the only rationale that the states put forth with any conviction ? that same-sex couples and their children don?t?need?marriage because same-sex couples can?tproduce?children, intended or unintended ? is so full of holes that it cannot be taken seriously.?

?Today yet another federal appeals court issued a ruling affirming that no state should be able to tell two people in love they can?t legally marry, just because they are gay or lesbian,? said Human Rights Campaign (HRC) Legal Director Sarah Warbelow.? ?LGBT families in these two states are just as deserving of the rights and protections that come with civil marriage as any other family across the country.? The Supreme Court of the United States today has even more evidence that marriage equality should be the law of the land in America.?

Aside from the cases decided today by the Seventh Circuit, cases from nine other states are currently pending before four federal appeals courts.? The Tenth and Fourth Circuits both recently upheld rulings striking down state bans on marriage equality ??Kitchen v. Herbert?of Utah and?Bishop v. Smith?of Oklahoma in the Tenth Circuit, and?Bostic v. Shaefer?of Virginia in the Fourth Circuit.? In total, 33 states either have marriage equality or have seen state marriage bans struck down as unconstitutional in federal or state court.? Since the Supreme Court?s historic marriage rulings last year, there have been 21 federal court decisions that bans on marriage equality are unconstitutional, with only one ruling in federal court upholding a ban. ?These rulings have come from judges appointed by both Democratic and Republican presidents.

The Supreme Court is under no obligation as to which case or cases ? if any ? it choses to hear on appeal.?? However, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg recently told reporters the Court will not ?duck? a marriage case.? “I think the court will not do what they did in the old days when they continually ducked the issue of miscegenation,” Ginsburg said. “If a case is properly before the court, they will take it.”

Gallup puts support for marriage equality at 55 percent ? an astonishing 15 points increase from just 5 years ago ? with?other polls?showing support at even higher margins.? And support for same-sex marriage rights continues to grow in virtually every demographic group.? According to ABC News / Washington Post,?77 percent of adults under age 30?favor marriage equality.? 40 percent of Republicans ? an all-time high and jump of 16 points in under two years ? now support marriage for gay and lesbian couples, while the number of Catholics supporting marriage has grown to 62 percent,according to the New York Times.? These numbers continue to grow, with no indication that support will slow down.

Same-sex couples?can legally marry?in nineteen states and the District of Columbia, while?31 states?have a law or constitutional amendment restricting marriage to the union of one man and one woman.? For more information on this and other marriage equality cases across the country, visit?www.americansformarriageequality.org

THE CASES

Indiana?? On June 25th, 2014, U.S. District Court Judge Richard L. Young ruled that Indiana?s ban on marriage equality is unconstitutional.? The ruling covered three separate cases:?Baskin vs. Bogan, Fujii v. State of Indiana,?and?Lee v. Pence.? Judge Young did not stay the ruling, and couples immediately began marrying.? Previously the court granted emergency relief for one of the plaintiff couples in the?Baskin?case, ordering the state to recognize their marriage as one of the women is battling terminal cancer.? Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller appealed Judge Young?s ruling, as well as the court order compelling the state to recognize the plaintiff couple?s marriage, and requested a stay of the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.? On June 27th, 2014, the Seventh Circuit granted Attorney General Zoeller?s stay request, and also consolidated the three marriage cases for the appeal.? Three days later, the Seventh Circuit issued an order forcing the state to continue recognizing the marriage of the individual plaintiff couple battling illness.? The plaintiffs in?Baskin v. Bogan?are represented by attorneys from Lambda Legal and the law firm of Kirkland and Ellis LLP.? The?Fujii?plaintiffs are represented by the ACLU and LeMieux Law Office.? And the plaintiffs? attorneys in?Lee v. Pence?are with Austin & Jones, P.C.; Fillenwarth Dennerline Groth & Towe, LLP; Sniderman Nguyen, LLP; and Sweeney Law Group, LLC.

Wisconsin?? On June 6, 2014, U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb ruled against Wisconsin?s constitutional amendment banning marriage equality.? In?Wolf v. Walker, the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Wisconsin and the law firm of Mayer Brown LLP sued the state on behalf of four couples seeking to marry, arguing that the Wisconsin?s ban on marriage equality violates the couples? due process and equal protection rights under the 14th?Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.? Judge Crabb did not stay her ruling, but also left unclear whether the state should stop enforcing the ban.? Couples began marrying in the state and Wisconsin officials requested a stay from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals, but were denied, with the appeals court saying Judge Crabb had still not issued final judgment.? Ultimately, Judge Crabb stayed her ruling, citing the Supreme Court of the United States? decision to halt marriages in Utah following a similar federal court ruling striking down that state?s marriage equality ban.

The Human Rights Campaign is America?s largest civil rights organization working to achieve lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality. By inspiring and engaging all Americans, HRC strives to end discrimination against LGBT citizens and realize a nation that achieves fundamental fairness and equality for all.

 

human-rights-campaign-logo